Our Idiot Brother (or Our Idiotic Script?)

Along with Paul Rudd's Ned, the film's humour at this moment gets arrested

It’s hard not to like Paul Rudd’s character in his latest film, Our Idiot Brother.  Ned is laid back, sweet and unassuming, and we all sense that his presence in our lives would benefit us some way or another – if not by helping us to see the bigger picture, then by giving us that odd laugh and making us thankful that we didn’t turn out as simple as he did.  Unfortunately, it takes a lot more than a likeable protagonist to make a movie watchable.  Our Idiot Brother is a perfect example of this.

The film follows Ned, a naïve and quixotic organic farmer, as he boomerangs from relative to relative trying to make ends meet.  After being released from prison for selling pot to a uniformed police officer, he returns to his farm to learn his girlfriend has a new guy and no longer wants him working there.  Adding insult to injury, she appropriates his beloved canine, Willie Nelson (giving the film a catalyst that it for the most part decides to abandon).  His other sisters (played by the coldly feminine Zooey Deschanel and the stunning Elizabeth Banks) do their best to help him scrape by, but find their own lives marred by his presence, particularly his penchant to disclose sensitive details of their lives to others.  The eldest sister, Liz, appears to be going through a mid-life crisis, and though she welcomes Ned into her family, her two-timing husband (the typecast yet brilliant Steve Coogan) shows him nothing but condescension and disdain.  Ned forms a bond with their son and helps foment his interest in martial arts, which Ned’s sister and brother-in-law will not accept.  This is where the film is its strongest – showcasing healthy relationships that must for whatever reason be severed.

It fails, however, in a number of places.  The star-studded cast is so plentiful that we never get the chance to cozy up to any of them.  They are all extensions of our hero, Ned, and as the titular “our,” you’d expect them to be sympathetic too.  After all, we are to see Ned through their lens.  But not only are they unpleasant, they are so absorbed in their own metropolitan hipster lives that we end up cringing as the film rotates through the build-up their trifling concerns.  Yes, it’s mildly upsetting to witness Deschanel’s character cheat on her more joyous and fun-loving girlfriend (played by Rashida Jones), but the distance between audience and character prevents us from ever truly caring.  And while we may have liked Jones’s character in the first half of the film, she ends up being just another person who betrays Ned when he needs her the most.  The film ends up a mess of two extremes:  Ned, the sympathetic push-over whose family takes care of him only out of a sense of duty, and the wholly unsympathetic secondary characters, all of whom are thinly painted and more or less contemptible.

The star-studded cast sets out to make us as bored as they are

The script falters, hardly providing any satisfaction for Ned in his journey.  Instead, he fumbles with even the most menial responsibilities, and we grimace as we watch time and time again where his patheticness will lead him.  There is some minor relief at the conclusion, but it comes much too late to negate the tedious jibber-jabber that constitutes the bulk of the film.

Despite the producers’ attempts to pitch the film as a comedy, the biggest laughs are shown in the trailer, chief among them the scene where Ned earnestly sells a cop a bag of weed.  Watch that clip on youtube sixty times in a row and not only will you save yourself 11 bucks, you’ll leave the room no less clueless about what makes a good story.

Verdict:  Despite Paul Rudd’s apt portrayal of a painfully naïve hippie, the script proves humourless, and the secondary characters are too uninspired to elicit anything more than a resentful yawn.



4 thoughts on “Our Idiot Brother (or Our Idiotic Script?)

  1. Nice Review! Paul Rudd is terrific as the loveable, good-hearted, naive Ned. His warmth makes this a feel good film, but the annoying sisters take their toll and nearly ruin my Rudd buzz.

  2. Agreed. It didn’t seem to know what kind of movie it wanted to be. The sweet and touching moments were too few, the relationships underdeveloped, and the humour either missed the mark or was just plain off-putting. Paul Rudd somehow remained unscathed.

  3. First off.. Paul Rudd is so cool. Paul… if you’re reading this… we should hang out some time and tell eachother jokes. I bet yours will be better than mine, but that’s ok. It will still be fun.
    Ok so I want to talk about my favorite part of the movie. I like when they are trying to have family game night but the sisters are being real jerks. So Ned yells “CAN WE JUST PLAY THE F—ING GAME!!!??” I feel like I can related to this because sometimes when I’m at my girl friend’s house, I like to play a game called “Guess what position I have your daughter in” upstairs in her room… but her parents don’t like that game… and sometimes I just want to yell our “CAN’T WE JUST PLAY THE GAME?!?!”. Thank you for letting me share that story with you.

    Paul… call me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s